Vol: 11, Issue: 3 2021

Page: 183-202

The Role of Supply Chain of the Learning on Organizational Evaluation: An Exploratory Study of the Opinions of a Sample of ICT Teachers

Prof Dr Qays Ibrahim Hussein Al-Zaidi, Anaam Mahmood Abdulrazzaq

Received Date: 2021-07-14

Accepted Date: 2021-08-31

Published Date: 2021-09-03

The subject of the learning supply chain has gained great importance by researchers in the theoretical and applied fields of organizations in order to achieve competitive advantage. Through this importance, the research problem has been identified by raising questions about the knowledge of the dimensions of the learning supply chain and its appropriateness in the organization under study, as well as knowing the requirements for its success and its role in organizational evaluation. The main objectives of the research are to identify the researchers’ views on defining the concept of the learning supply chain, as well as diagnosing the nature of the influence relationship between the dimensions of the learning supply chain and organizational evaluation, and also used in the research the null hypothesis, Through the research, a number of conclusions were reached, the most important of which is that the learning supply chain has a significant impact on the organizational evaluation. aligns with its objectives.

References

• Acree, J., & Chouinard, J. (2019). Exploring use and influence in Culturally Responsive Approaches to Evaluation: A review of the empirical literature. American Journal of Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 55 Evaluation, 1-5.
• Adou, Jean-Yves & Osei, Sampson, (2017), organization of environmental forces that can boost performance, eVALUation.
• Bakewell, O. (2003) Sharpening the Development Process: A Practical Guide to Monitoring and Evaluation, Oxford: INTRAC
• Baninajarian, N., & Abdullah, Z. (2009). Groups in Context: A Model of Group Effectiveness, European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.8, No.2, pp.335-340.
• Bartuševi?ien?, Ilona & Šakalyt?, Evelina, (2013), ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION: EFFECTIVENESS VS. EFFICIENCY, Social Transformations in Contemporary Society, no.1,pp. 45-53.
• Bender AF, Pigeyre F. “Job evaluation and gender pay equity: a French example”. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(45), 267-279, 2016
• Bourgeois, I., & Cousins, J. B. (2013). Understanding dimensions of organizational evaluation capacity. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(3), 299–319.
• Bourgeois, I., Hart, R. E., Townsend, S. H., & Gagné, M. (2011). Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(3), 228–235
• Bourgeois, Isabelle., Toews, Eleanor., Whynot,Jane & Lamarche, Mary Kay, (2013), MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION CAPACITY IN THE CANADIAN, The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Vol. 28 No. 2 Pages 1–19
• Brandtner, C. (2017). Putting the World in Orders: Plurality in Organizational Evaluation. Sociological Theory, 35(3), 200–227.
• Busienei, E. (2017) Effect of job evaluation on employees job satisfaction: a comparative Analysis of male and female employees at Airtel Kenya, Masters project. University of Nairobi, Vol. 1 Iss. 1, 2020 (pp. 1-24)
• Carden, F. (2013). Evaluation, not development evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(4), 576-579
• Chandi, S.,(2015), Job evaluation: definition, concept, need and benefits of job evaluation
• Chaneta, I. (2014). Effects of job evaluation on decision involving pay equity, Asian social Science, 10(4), 123-131.
• Chelimsky, E. (2009).Integrating evaluation units into the political environment of government: The role of evaluation policy. New Directions for Evaluation, 3 (123), pp.51- 61.
• Chelimsky, E. (2012). Valuing, evaluation methods, and the politicization of the evaluation process. New Directions for Evaluation, 133, 77–84
• Choudhary, S. (2016). Job evaluation: a strategy for compensation consistency, International journal of advanced research in management and smocialsciences, 5(5), 90- 100.
• Chouinard, J., & Cram, F. (2019). Situating culturally responsive approaches to evaluation: Empirical implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE
• Christie, C., & Lemire, S. (2019). Why evaluation theory should be used to inform evaluation policy. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(4), 490-508.
• Cousins, J. B., & Bourgeois, I, (2014). Organizational capacity to do and use evaluation [Special issue]. New Directions for Evaluation, 141.
• Datta, L. (2009). Golden is the sand: Memory and hope in evaluation policy and evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 123, 33–50.
• ESIANSAH, SUZANNE J. PIOTROWSKI, (2014), ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION TOOLS: REPORT CARDS AND SCORECARDS OF THE FEDERAL AGENCIES, PAQ SPRING,pp.109-142.
• Feinstein, O.N. (2012). Evaluation as a learning tool. New Directions for Evaluation, 35, 112–103
• Hackman, J. R. and C. G. Morris, 1975. Group tasks, group interaction process and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In: D. L. Gladstein, 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 29, pp. 499-517
• Heilman S. & Kennedy-Phillips L. (2011). Making Evaluation Easier With the Organizational Effectiveness Model describe a comprehensive, step-by-step, mixedmethods Evaluation model. Published online by American College Personnel Association and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Volume 15, Issue 6, pp.29-32.