International Journal of Transformations in Business Management

(By Aryavart International University, India)

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN : 2231-6868 | P-ISSN : 2454-468X

SJIF 2020: 6.336 |SJIF 2021 : 6.109 | ICV 2020=66.47

+91 9555269393   info@ijtbm.com


Abstract

Vol: 15, Issue: 3 2025

Page: 1-20

The Impact Of Multidimensional Concurrent Engineering On The Possibility Of Establishing A Hybrid Manufacturing System: An Analytical Diagnostic Study Of The Opinions Of A Sample Of Workers In The Northern Cement Assistant / Badoush Cement Factory

Dr. Raafat Assi Hussein

Received Date: 2025-05-20

Accepted Date: 2025-07-02

Published Date: 2025-07-06

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijtbm.v15i03.001

By relying on smart manufacturing systems, organizations seek to reduce the damage and loss in their products to the lowest levels, trying to achieve distinctive levels of quality through which they can outperform their competitors. Therefore, this research attempt came to address two important topics in management thought, namely concurrent engineering and the hybrid manufacturing system, in an attempt by the researcher to analyze the relationships correlation and Impact between the dimensions of concurrent engineering represented by (product design, process design, supply chain design) and the hybrid manufacturing system represented by (continuous improvement, waste management, information systems, deferral point) in order to identify the most important dimensions that can contribute significantly to establishing the hybrid manufacturing system. The research was conducted in (Northern Cement Cooperative / Badoush Cement Expansion Plant) on a sample of department managers, division officials and engineers in the company, numbering (213) individuals. The research relied on a questionnaire form for the purpose of collecting data, and used in the research a set of computerized statistical methods using the ((Spss/Amos) system to process and analyze data. The research reached a set of conclusions, the most prominent of which were: The company under study is interested in applying concurrent engineering technology, which enhances the improvement of the hybrid manufacturing system, and its need to achieve distinctive levels of flexibility in manufacturing its products, with the aim of increasing its ability to meet customer demands. The research reached a number of recommendations, the most prominent of which is that the company's management must focus its attention on updating and developing machines and equipment with the aim of adapting them to produce the required products and making continuous improvements to them to achieve distinctive levels of flexibility in manufacturing.

Back Download PDF

References

  • Al-Baik, O., & Miller, J. (2016). Kaizen cookbook: The success recipe for continuous learning and improvements. IEEE Journal.
  • Al-Bakri, S. M. (2001). Production and operations management - systems introduction. University House.
  • Al-Barzanji, H. S. N. (2007). The effect of concurrent engineering on product development [Master's thesis]. University of Baghdad.
  • Al-Faihan, E. A. H. (2011). Production and operations management (1st ed.). University of Baghdad.
  • Al-Jashami, K. A. J. (2013). The role of manufacturing flexibility and process design in the dimensions of the content of operations strategy [Doctoral dissertation]. Al-Mustansiriya University.
  • Al-Kiki, G. M. A. (2012). The possibility of applying the elements of lean production: A field study in the children's clothing factory in Mosul. Tikrit Journal of Administrative and Economic Sciences, 8(26).
  • Al-Rubaie, B. A. H. (2019). Designing a lean manufacturing system using the value stream map and its impact on improving productivity. Al-Mustansiriya University.
  • Al-Taweel, A. A., Al-Ghadrofi, M. H., & Al-Talbi, A. A. (2019). Lean manufacturing techniques and their impact on the dimensions of sustainable development: An exploratory study in a number of small industrial organizations in Nineveh Governorate. The Third Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Administration and Economics - Anbar University.
  • Alzidani, M. (2021). Optimization of the scheduling strategy using meta-heuristics approach in the context of cellular manufacturing with multiples products [Doctoral dissertation]. École de Technologie Supérieure.
  • Baird, J. (2016). The concept of waste and waste management. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 6(4).
  • Beer, C. (2013). Sustainable waste management: A decision support framework [Master's thesis]. Stellenbosch University.
  • Beikzad, J. (2013). Management information system, challenges and solutions. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3).
  • Botti, L., Mora, C., & Regattieri, A. (2017). Integrating ergonomics and lean manufacturing principles in a hybrid assembly line. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.011
  • Can, I. (2008). Case study S.C. Redplast S.R.L., operation management. International Journal of Bulletin, Transylvania University of Braşov, 9(58)(1).
  • Djaja, K. (2017). The importance of waste management knowledge to encourage household waste-sorting behavior in Indonesia. International Journal of Waste Resources, 7(4).
  • Dulanji, P. (2020). Moving from lean to leagile: A framework to improve supply chain performance of fashion garment manufacturing. International Journal Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dubai, 2.
  • Evans, J. (2007). Impacts of information management on business performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(4).
  • Fatime, A. (2019). Leagile manufacturing practices and supply chain performance, of food and beverage manufacturing companies in Kenya [Master's thesis]. University of Nairobi.
  • Finch, B. J. (2006). Operations now: Profitability, processes, performance (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
  • Fosters, S. T. (2001). Managing quality: An integration approach (1st ed.). Prentice-Hill.
  • Frostel, K. (2014). Progress and challenges to the global waste management system. Journal of Permissions, 32(9). Haizer, J., Render, B., & Mlinson, C. (2017). Operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management (12th ed.). Pearson.
  • Hossain, M. M., Hossain, D., Hossain, M. A., Ahmad, F., Hoque, M. M., & Rahman, M. (2016). Lead time reduction and process cycle improvement of an ice-cream manufacturing factory in Bangladesh by using value stream map and Kanban board: A case study. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 15(10).
  • Ilakovac, B. (2017). Concept of sustainable waste management in the city of Zagreb: Towards the implementation of circular economy approach. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 67(2).
  • Jawahar, N., & Subhaa, R. (2017). An adjustable grouping genetic algorithm for the design of cellular manufacturing system integrating structural and operational parameters. Journal of Manufacturing System, 44.
  • Jesson, J. (2018). The unacceptable face of the global knowledge economy. New Zealand Journal of Teachers, University of Auckland, 19, 78.
  • Juan, M. (2010). The integration of Six Sigma and lean management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(3). Kamara, J., Avaraba, C. J., & Deceller, A. F. C. (2007). Concurrent engineering in construction projects. Taylor & Francis.
  • Kawa, A. (2019). Lean and agile supply chains of e-commerce: Empirical research. Journal of Information and Telecommunication, 3(2).
  • Karim, A. (2011). The significance of management information systems for enhancing strategic and tactical planning. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 8(2).
  • Kraiewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P., & Malhotra, M. K. (2010). Operations management. Pearson Education. Makinen, J. T. (2011). Concurrent engineering approach plastic optics design [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oulu.
  • Khote, M. D. (2024). Hybrid manufacturing processes: Integrating additive subtractive techniques for enhanced manufacturing efficiency. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 9(10).
  • Marchetta, M. G., Mayer, F., & Forradellas, R. Q. (2011). A reference framework following a proactive approach for product lifecycle management. Computers in Industry, 62(7).
  • Marr, B., & Rowe, C. P. I. (2008). Managing and delivering performance (2nd ed.). Chippenham and Eastbourne. Mikva, M., Prajova, V., Yakimovich, B., Korshunov, A., & Tyurin, I. (2016). Standardization - One of the tools of continuous improvement. Elsevier Journal, 149.
  • Muhammad, A. (2019). Lean and agile paradigms in humanitarian organizations' logistics and supply chain management. Scientific Journal of Logistics, 15(1).
  • Nagaaba, N. (2016). Lean, agile and leagile manufacturing as antecedents to plant performance of manufacturing firms in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Uganda [PhD proposal]. Mbarara University of Science and Technology.
  • Naveen, R., Saha, R., & Sahai, R. (2018). Leagile manufacturing: A review paper. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 23(3).
  • Ogawa, A. (2008). Concurrent engineering for mission design in different cultures [Master's thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Owuor, O. B. (2016). Impact of lean manufacturing practices and operational performance of beer brewing process: A case study of Kenya Breweries Limited [Master's thesis]. University of Nairobi.
  • Roth, B. K. (2014). Enablers for lean process sustainability within South African manufacturing industries [Master's thesis]. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.
  • Sami, A. M. (2013). Contributions of concurrent engineering to enhancing marketing excellence [Master's thesis]. University of Mosul.
  • Scoggin, J. C. (2017). The interdependence of lean implementation and organization development [PhD thesis]. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
  • Seyedi, M. (2012). Supply chain management, lean manufacturing, agile production, and their combination. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(8).
  • Shahin, A., Gunasekaran, A., Khalili, A., & Hadi, S. (2016). A new approach for estimating leagile decoupling point using data envelopment analysis. Assembly Automation, 36(3).
  • Shouke, C., Zhuobio, W., & Jie, L. (2010). Comprehensive evaluation for construction performance in concurrent engineering environment. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7).
  • Slack, N., Chambers, S., & Johnston, R. (2004). Operations management (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
  • Smith, P. G. (2016). Development of a four stage continuous improvement framework to support business performance in manufacturing SMEs [Master's thesis]. University of Wolverhampton.
  • Sun, S. (2011). The strategic role of lean production in SOE's development. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(2).
  • Virmani, N., Saha, R., & Sahai, R. (2017). Quantifying key factors affecting leagile manufacturing system. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 11(4).
  • Wang, L. (2010). The effect of visibility in the integration of lean and agile for supply chains [PhD thesis]. University of Warwick, Warwick Manufacturing Group.
  • Wilson, L. (2010). How to implement lean manufacturing (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Yaacob, N. (2020). Measuring leagile supply chain, information sharing, and supply chain performance: Pre-test and pilot test. International Economic Journal, 11(4).

IJTBM
Typically replies within an hour

IJTBM
Hi there 👋

How can I help you?
×
Chat with Us