```php Survey on Team Effectiveness Measurements as Execution Key to Success | Abstract IJTBM

International Journal of Transformations in Business Management

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN : 2231-6868 | P-ISSN : 2454-468X

IMPACT FACTOR : 5.987 | SJIF 2020: 6.336 | ICV 2020=66.47

+91 9555269393 | +91 9311631393   info@ijtbm.com


Abstract

Survey on Team Effectiveness Measurements as Execution Key to Success

DEEPAK KUMAR GARG

Deptt. Of Management, Lord Krishna College of Engineering, Ghaziabad (U.P.)

DR. D.B. SINGH

Research Scholar, CMJ University, Shillong, Meghalaya

24-29 Vol: 2, Issue: 3, 2012
Receiving Date: 2012-05-12
Acceptance Date: 2012-06-13
Publication Date: 2012-07-14
Download PDF

Abstract

Strategic decisions should focus on Outcome, Time remaining, and current Value/priority. The outcome
comprises both the desired ending goal and the plan designed to reach that goal. Managing strategically
requires paying attention to the time remaining to reach a particular level or goal and adjusting the pace
and options accordingly. Value/priority relates to the shifting, relative concept of value-add. Strategic
decisions should be based on the understanding that the value-add of whatever you are managing is a
constantly changing reference point. An objective that begins with a high level of value-add may change
due to influence of internal and external factors. Strategic management by definition is managing with a
heads-up approach to outcome, time and relative value, and actively making course corrections as needed.

Keywords: Strategic decisions; Team Effectiveness; key to success

References

  1. Alderfer, C. P. (1997). Group and intergroup relations: Improving the quality of work life. Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
  2. Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32.
  3. Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261-295.
  4. Appelbaum, E., & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace: Transforming work systems in the United States. Ithaca: ILR Press.
  5. Armstrong, M. & Baron, A., (2004). Get into line. People Management, 10(20), 44-46. Retrieved June 28, 2007, from Business Source Premier database.
  6. Arnold, K. A., Barling, J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Transformational leadership or the iron cage: Which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy?
  7. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(7), 315-320.
  8. Retrieved December 24, 2006, from Emerald Group Publishing database.
  9. Atkinson, H., & Brown, J. B. (2001). Rethinking performance measures:
  10. Assessing progress in UK hotels. International Journal of Contemporary
  11. Hospitality Management, 13(3), 120-129. Retrieved December 2, 2006, from Emerald Group Publishing database.
  12. Bailey, C. D., Brown, L. D., & Cocco, A. F. (1998). The effects of monetary incentives on worker learning and performance in an assembly task.
  13. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 119-131. Retrieved
  14. January 2, 2006, from Business Source Premier database.
  15. Banks, R. I., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1979). Operations versus strategy – trading
  16. tomorrow for today. Harvard Business Review, 57(3), 112-20. Retrieved
  17. March15, 2007, from Business Source Premier database.
  18. Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31, 87.
  19. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
  20. Bates, S. (2004). Getting engaged. HR Magazine, (49)2, 44-51.
  21. Baumruk, R. (2004). The missing link: The role of employee engagement in business success. Workspan, (47), 48-52.
  22. Beazley, D. A. (2002). Spiritual orientation of a leader and perceived servant leader behavior: A correlational study. ProQuest Digital Dissertations,
  23. 63(04), 1436. (UMI No. AAT 3049889). Retrieved November 9, 2006, from
  24. Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking
  25. people, strategy, and performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  26. Berkman, E. (2002). How to use the balanced scorecard; you can’t tell when you’re winning if you don’t keep score. CIO, (15)15, 1-4. Retrieved
  27. November 1, 2007, from Lexis Nexis database.
  28. Berry, A., & Cartwright, S. (2000) Leadership: A Critical Construction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(7), 342-349. Retrieved April 26,
  29. Blake, R., & McCanse, A. (1991). Leadership dilemmas-grid solutions. Houston:
  30. Gulf Publishing. database.
  31. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2001). Leading with soul: An uncommon journey of the spirit. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  32. Bowie, N. (2000). A Kantian theory of leadership. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(4), 185-193. Retrieved April 21, 2007, from Emerald Group Publishing database.
  33. Bowman, R. F. (1997). Teacher as servant leader. Clearing House, 78(4), 26-31. London: Paul Chapman.
  34. Buchen, I. H. (1998). Servant leadership: A model for future faculty and future institutions. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(1), 25. Retrieved April 21,
  35. Performance Management, (55)1, 7-25. Retrieved February 2, 2007, from Campion, M. A.(1993). Relations between work groups characteristics and Campus, A. (1961). Resistance, rebellion, and death. New York: Knopf.
  36. Chatterjee, D. (1998). Leading consciously: A pilgrimage toward self-mastery. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Back

```