```php An Empirical Study on the Effect of Age, Qualification and Upbringing upon the Personality of Managers in Terms of Performance Indicator Using MBTI Dichotomy in BPO Sector at Delhi, India | Abstract IJTBM

International Journal of Transformations in Business Management

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN : 2231-6868 | P-ISSN : 2454-468X

IMPACT FACTOR : 5.987 | SJIF 2020: 6.336 | ICV 2020=66.47

+91 9555269393 | +91 9311631393   info@ijtbm.com


Abstract

An Empirical Study on the Effect of Age, Qualification and Upbringing upon the Personality of Managers in Terms of Performance Indicator Using MBTI Dichotomy in BPO Sector at Delhi, India

Ashish Kumar Singh

Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Jhunjhunu

1-19 Vol: 1, Issue: 3, 2011
Receiving Date: 2011-05-08
Acceptance Date: 2011-06-06
Publication Date: 2011-07-04
Download PDF

Abstract

All managers are not effective and similarly efficient but even though it is a general opinion which is rational also that a good qualification and upbringing makes a good personality. But even though the performance of managers is never good and managers suffers in their performance show off which are hampered by many reasons and so than the question arises- is it a age factor or something else. The paper hence tries to identify the relations amongst these detrimental yet important factors of association for any successful personality into analyzing what matters in the performance of managers in shaping the whole of theirs dimensions of success.

Keywords: Personality; Performance; Managers; Temperament

References

  1. Babcock, L. & S. Laschever. 2003. Women don’t ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton N. J. Princeton University Press
  2. Barbuto, J.E., (1997). A critique of the Myers – Briggs indicator and its operationalization of Carl Jung’s psychological types. Psychological Reports, 80, 611 – 625.
  3. Catalyst. 2003a. Advancing Latinas in the workplace: What managers need to know? New York: Author.
  4. Catalyst. 2003b. Advancing Asian women in the workplace: Catalyst’s new guide for managers. New York: Author.
  5. Hays-Thomas, R. 2004. Why now? The contemporary focus on managing diversity. In Stockdale, M.S. & F.J. Crosby, eds. The Psychology and management of workplace diversity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd. 1-30.
  6. Harvey, R J (1996) Reliability and Validity, in MBTI Applications. A.L. Hammer, Editor. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA. p. 5- 29.
  7. Hill, A. B., (1999). Personality characteristics associated with academic achievement among developmental college students. (Doctoral)
  8. Kanter, R.M. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
  9. Karsten, M.F. 1992. Gender issues in management.. Madison: Author. p. 23.
  10. Myers, Isabel Briggs; McCaulley Mary H.; Quenk, Naomi L.; Hammer, Allen L. (1998). MBTI Manual (A guide to the development and use of the Myers Briggs type indicator). Consulting Psychologists Press; 3rd ed edition. ISBN 0- 89106-130-4.
  11. Pettigrew, T., & Tropp, L. (2006, May).A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
  12. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783
  13. Sokal, Michael M. (ed.) (1990) Psychological Testing and American Society 1890-1930 Rutgers.
Back

```