Using the Decoy Effect on Telephone Packages: A Study on Consumer Behavior
Zayan Shaikh
12th Grade, A-Level, Dubai College Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Aakash Dhananjay Shanbhag
Los Angeles, United States of America
Download PDF
http://doi.org/10.37648/ijtbm.v13i03.009
Abstract
The decoy effect is a type of nudge found in behavioral economics that suggests that the introduction of a high-priced, low-value decoy good into a choice set will prompt consumers to shift their preference from a lower-priced, option good to a higher-priced, target good. The theory has proven to become a recognized marketing tool used by firms following the coining of the term in 1982. However, despite the various applications of the theory to different industries, the implications of the theory have not been explored in the context of telephone packages provided by telecommunications firms. Therefore, in this paper, we will explore the impacts of the decoy effect in the context of telephone packages in the United Arab Emirates through means of surveys which will explore shifts in consumer preferences when presented with decoy packages for the two largest telecommunications firms in the country. The paper also assesses the extent of the success of the decoy, as well as the demographics in which the introduction of a decoy package proved to be most effective and the wider-reaching implications for telecommunications firms.
Keywords: Telephone Package; Decoy; Option; Target
References
- “What Is Behavioral Economics?,” University of Chicago News, https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/what-isbehavioral-economics (accessed Aug. 28, 2023).
- Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Penguin Books, 1759.
- Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books, 2008.
- Josiam, Bharath & Hobson, J.S.. (1995). Consumer Choice in Context: The Decoy Effect in Travel and Tourism. Journal of Travel Research - J TRAVEL RES. 34. 45-50. 10.1177/004728759503400106.
- . Jacoby, J., Speller, D.E. and Kohn, C.A., 1974. Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. Journal of marketing research, 11(1), pp.63-69.
- Luce, R. Duncan. Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. Courier Corporation, 2012.
- “What Is Market Cannibalization? Types and How to Prevent It,” Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcannibilization.asp (accessed Aug. 28, 2023)
- Huber, Joel, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto. “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis.” Journal of Consumer Research 9, no. 1 (1982): 90–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488940.
- What is Decoy Effect?,” Peep Strategy, https://peepstrategy.com/what-is-decoy-effect/#google_vignette (accessed Aug. 28, 2023).
- Ulbinaite, Aurelija & Kucinskiene, Marija & Le Moullec, Yannick. (2011). Integration of the Decoy Effect in an Agent-Based-Model Simulation of Insurance Consumer Behavior. International Conference on Computer and Business Management.
- Simonson, Itamar, and Amos Tversky. “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion.” Journal of Marketing Research 29, no. 3 (1992): 281–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172740.
- Stata, https://www.stata.com/ (accessed Sept. 2, 2023)
- . Bhui, Rahul, and Yang Xiang. 2021. “A Rational Account of the Repulsion Effect.” PsyArXiv. December 31. doi:10.31234/osf.io/hxjqv
- Luo B, Li L, Sun Y. Understanding the Influence of Consumers' Perceived Value on Energy-Saving Products Purchase Intention. Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 31;12:640376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640376. PMID: 35178004; PMCID: PMC8844988.