Environment Impact of Hydel Power Projects in Himachal Pradesh: A Case Study of District Kullu
Vikrant Thakur
Download PDF
Abstract
The study was conducted in District Kullu to find out the environmental impact of hydro power
projects in eight different locations. The projects selected are operational at Aleo, Baragran, Kothi,
Lag Valley, Malana, Palchan and Prini. Since eight different sites had been taken for the study,
twenty respondents were selected from each site. For the project employees, unstructured interview
method was administered. The interview questions were framed to detect the participants experience
and outcome by story telling describing some strategic issues they encountered and how they were
dealt within their organizations. The main aim was to probe participants experience in terms of the
pre and post construction phases of the project and practices that drive what and how strategic
decisions were made and implemented in their projects with respect to the environmental impact.
Therefore to know the responses of the employees of the respective hydel project three respondents
were selected from each site. The sample size that has been selected for the study was 184
respondents to whom the survey was administered. This survey schedule was pre-tested in the field,
prior to start of the socio-economic survey. The filled-in survey schedules were scrutinized. Data
analysis was undertaken using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) computer software. The
analyzed outputs have been used in reporting the findings of the socio-economic survey. The study
revealed that the environmental condition has not been affected by any of the project activities.
Keywords: hydel power projects; impact; environment
References
- A.John Sinclair, Assessing the impacts of micro hydro power development in the Kullu District, Himachal Pradesh, India, Mountain Research and Development, 23(1),2003, 11-13.
- Anonymous (2003b). Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Environmental Impact Assessment and Planning General Directorate, Official Gazzette, p.25150
- Anonymous (2008). Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Environmental Impact Assessment and Planning General Directorate, Official Gazzette, p.26939.
- Pearce, D.W. and Warford, J.J. (1993), World without End Economics, Environment and Sustainable Development, Oxford University Press, New York.
- Ranasinghe, M (1994), “Extended Benefit Cost Analysis: Quantifying some Environmental Impacts in a Hydropower Project”, Project Appraisal, Beech Tree Publishing, U.K., Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 243-251.
- SHERPA (2010). Hydropower and Environment - Technical and Operational Procedures to Better Integrate Small Hydropower Plants Operational Procedures to Better Integrate Small Hydropower Plants in the Environment. Intelligent Energy for Europe and Small Hydropower Energy Efficiency Campaign Action (SHERPA). APER, Italy, p.23.
- Trussart S, Messier D, Roquet V, Aki S (2002). Hydropower projects: A review of most effective mitigation measures. Energy Policy, 30:1251-1259.