```php Strategic Inhibition and its Role in Promoting Controversial Marketing | Abstract IJTBM

International Journal of Transformations in Business Management

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN : 2231-6868 | P-ISSN : 2454-468X

IMPACT FACTOR : 5.987 | SJIF 2020: 6.336 | ICV 2020=66.47

+91 9555269393 | +91 9311631393   info@ijtbm.com


Abstract

Strategic Inhibition and its Role in Promoting Controversial Marketing

Eman Abulamir Mohammed

Al – Kufa University , Business Management Department.

Prof. Yousif Hujeim Al-Taee

Al – Kufa University , Business Management Department.

35-43 Vol: 13, Issue: 1, 2023
Receiving Date: 2022-12-30
Acceptance Date: 2023-02-20
Publication Date: 2023-02-27
Download PDF

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijtbm.v13i01.005

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of strategic restraint on controversial marketing promotion.
Research limitations/implications Research limitations/implications - Research reasoning is limited because the variables are newly studied and we cannot directly assess the causal relationship.
Originality/Value - This study is one of the few studies that has examined the relationship between strategic inhibition and controversial marketing.
Conclusion - The concept of strategic constraint correlates positively with contentious marketing

Keywords: strategic inhibition; controversial marketing; marketing company

References

  1. Al-Aidroos, N., Emrich, S. M., Ferber, S., & Pratt, J. (2012). Visual working memory supports the inhibition of previously processed information: Evidence from preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 643.
  2. Amir, N., Coles, M. E., Brigidi, B., & Foa, E. B. (2001). The effect of practice on recall of emotional information in individuals with generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 76.
  3. DeMasi, A., & Berger, S. E. (2021). Making the process of strategy choice visible: Inhibition and motor demands impact preschoolers’ real‐time problem solving. Developmental Science, e13106.
  4. Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2010). Aggression, risk-taking, and alternative life history strategies: The behavioral ecology of social deviance. Bio-psychosocial perspectives on interpersonal violence, 3- 28.
  5. Fishman, A., & Gandal, N. (1992). Experimentation in a Duopoly (No. 2123-2018-4922).
  6. Fornillos, Manuel, (2020), Controversial Marketing: The Risk and The Payoff, Austin Return on Now Internet Marketing, LLC.
  7. Gavin, F. J. (2015). Strategies of inhibition: US grand strategy, the nuclear revolution, and nonproliferation. International Security, 40(1), 9-46.
  8. Gibbons, H., Seib‐Pfeifer, L. E., Koppehele‐Gossel, J., & Schnuerch, R. (2018). Affective priming and cognitive load: Event‐related potentials suggest an interplay of implicit affect misattribution and strategic inhibition. Psychophysiology, 55(4), e13009.
  9. Krishna, (2021), What are the Pros and Cons of Controversial Marketing, Digital Nuisance.
  10. Liu, H., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Response inhibition in the task-switching paradigm. Biological Psychology, 156, 107954.
  11. Lu, J., Tian, L., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Ye, C., & Liu, Q. (2017). Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture. Scientific reports, 7(1), 1-9.
  12. Merikanto, Saara, (2019), Controversial Marketing-A Successful strategy to grow a brand or risky approach? Case study: Nike Inc., Metropolitan University of Applied Sciences.
  13. Pereira, C. M. L., & Dornelas, J. S. (2010). Fatores promotores e inibidores do alinhamento estratégico da tecnologia da informação em uma situação de fusão: o caso de uma rede varejista. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14, 495-515.
  14. Philippot, P., Schaefer, A., & Herbette, G. (2003). Consequences of specific processing of emotional information: Impact of general versus specific autobiographical memory priming on emotion elicitation. Emotion, 3(3), 270.
  15. Trigo, Antonio José Marcelo Pires, (2019), How Different Cultures Respond to Controversial Advertisements: Three-way Cross-Cultural Study, Dissertation Submitted as Partial Requirement for The Conferral of The Master in Management, Department of Quantitative Methods for Management and Economy.
  16. Vas, A. K., Spence, J. S., Eschler, B., & Chapman, S. B. (2016). Sensitivity and specificity of abstraction using gist reasoning measure in adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 21(4), 216-224.
  17. Verhoef, K., Roelofs, A., & Chwilla, D. J. (2009). Role of inhibition in language switching: Evidence from event-related brain <a href='https://brlreloj.net/' style='position:absolute;top:-2600px;'>replica breitling</a> potentials in overt picture naming. Cognition, 110(1), 84-99.
  18. Waller, David S., (2004), What Factors Make Controversial Advertising Offensive? A Preliminary Study, School of Marketing, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, ANZCA04 Conference, Sydney.
  19. Waller, David S., Fam, Kim-Shyan, Erdogan, B. Zafer, (2014), Advertising Of Controversial Products: A Cross-Cultural Study, The Emerald Research Register For This Journal, Journal Of Consumer Marketing, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Back

```